Wednesday, March 16, 2022

No Fly Zone is a Very Bad Idea

 

The war in the Ukraine drags on and now some people are calling for a ‘No Fly’ Zone to be enforced over the conflict region.

We should be very clear what a No Fly Zone means:  It means World War III.

A No Fly Zone is enforced by shooting down any aircraft that violate the Zone.  Shooting down aircraft and killing the crews is an Act of War.

If NATO attempts to enforce a No Fly Zone it will immediately escalate into open warfare between multiple nuclear-armed nations.  This is a Very Bad Thing.

Here is what No Fly enforcement would look like:


NATO would declare the No Fly Zone. In order to enforce the Zone, you have to put NATO aircraft in the air over Ukraine very close to the front lines.  Backed by AWACs airborne radar, they would fly Combat Air Patrol over the disputed territory. 

Russian aircraft would ignore the rules and continue combat flight operations over Ukraine.  Of course, the Russians have fighter jets too, and they would attempt to protect the bombers, transports and attack helicopters. 

NATO would have a choice: Do nothing and look like impotent morons or shoot down the offending aircraft.  

Shooting down Russian planes would be the first shots of WWIII.

Of course, the disputed territory is also filled with Russian antiaircraft missiles.  Those missiles would be fired at the NATO planes.  NATO would respond with SEAD strikes (Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses).  NATO aircraft would directly attack Russian troops on the ground in an effort to knock out the SAM (surface to air missiles) batteries.  THIS IS WWIII. 

Alternatively, NATO could position Patriot missile batteries deep inside Ukraine to enforce the No Fly Zone.   These missile systems would need to be manned by NATO troops because the Ukrainians are not trained to use them.  The Russians, being shot at by SAM’s, would target those positions and attack them.  NATO troops would die.  This is WWIII.

If NATO somehow managed to establish local air superiority over Ukraine, Russia could still target NATO aircraft with long range SAM’s launched from within Russia.  This would force NATO planes to attack Russian soil to suppress those missile batteries. 

WWIII would quickly spread and escalate. 

The US would send a Carrier battle group into the region to allow the Navy to support the effort.  Russian submarines would find that to be a tempting target, and NATO would be forced to start sinking submarines in order to protect the carriers.

Flying combat missions over Ukraine from Poland or Germany would greatly reduce the amount of time the fighters could loiter in the combat zone.  You would need multiple tankers for air-to-air refueling. NATO would increase combat effectiveness by using Ukrainian airbases.  This would require NATO troops on the ground to protect against Russian special forces attacks.

NATO would need to knock out Russian radar sites near the Ukrainian border.  These sites inside The Motherland are well defended and would be very costly to attack.  NATO would resort to cruise missiles to evade and degrade the air defenses.  These weapons normally carry high explosives warheads, but cruise missiles can also carry nuclear warheads.   From the Russian point of view, a wave of cruise missiles crossing the border headed toward Moscow would be indistinguishable from a nuclear first strike. 

The Russians would have 5-15 minutes to decide – is this a conventional strike targeting our air defense network?  Or is NATO launching nukes in an effort to cripple Russia’s nuclear defense capabilities and kill Putin?  Well, comrade, do we launch our nukes, or do we risk nuclear annihilation?  You now have 4 minutes to decide….

And that, folks, is how nuclear wars get started. 

A No Fly Zone is a terrible, awful, no good idea.  Best case scenario it starts WWIII and kills millions.  Worst case scenario it leads to nuclear war and the death of billions, if not the outright extinction of the human race. 

If you are cheerleading for a No Fly Zone, you are cheering for the apocalypse. 

 



Tuesday, March 8, 2022

Something strange is happening in the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

 Something strange is happening in the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

More specifically, something strange that is NOT happening.
Where is the combat footage?
Where are the cell phone videos and the Go Pro videos that surely exist if 2 modern countries with access to the latest electronics are fighting? Why don't we see a flood of videos showing troops being shelled or returning fire? Where are the sniper videos and the ambush videos?
We see some images of damage. We see abandoned and or damaged vehicles. We see some distant explosions.
Where are the videos of Russian tanks being ambushed? The Ukrainian claim to have knocked out hundreds of tanks, and hundreds more other armored vehicles. Not one Ukrainian thought to pull out a cell phone and record the moment?
Every Russian has a GoPro mounted on the dash of their car for recording traffic accidents. Every Ukrainian girl has a TikTok account with 100k followers that documents every second of their life.
This should be the most well documented war in history.
But we see nothing.
And most of the stuff we do see is obviously not Ukrainian combat footage. Anti-tank missiles being launched with palm trees in the background and dudes shouting in Arabic. "Captured" tanks with a small puddle of burning gas on the hull but no other combat damage.
Something is off here.

WWDD? Flee, of course.

 


“We are all Ukrainians now!” is the current mania as the brave people of the Ukraine fight for their freedoms. 

Oh really??  I’m not so sure about that.

Only 40% of Democrats would stay and fight for their country event of a foreign invasion (!), according to a new poll.  

Only 68% of Republicans would stay and fight. 

Overall, a just a little more than half of Americans love their country enough to fight for it. 

I am absolutely disgusted by the results of this poll.  

I am disappointed with the Republican answer.  25% of them would flee to another country.

I am disgusted by the Democrats answer.  Only 40% are prepared to give the last full measure of their devotion to save the country that they claim to love.   More than half of Democrats polled (52%) would flee rather than fight.

I see what is happening in this country, a nation conceived in liberty and dedicated to proposition that all men are created equal.  I have my doubts whether this nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure.

 

When Democrats tell you that they are patriots more than half of them are lying to you.  Ever wonder why a party would advocate for policies that are so obviously destructive?  Well, now you have your answer.

Why are we electing to positions of power a party that loves this country so little that only 40% would fight for it?